Are ring doorbells an invasion of privacy?

Data protection rights and Ring Doorbells Fairhurst v Woodward recently went to the County Court in Oxford where the judge ruled the defendant's use of a Ring doorbell as an 'unjustifiable invasion of privacy'.

express.co.uk - Why installing ring doorbell in these three places could land you a legal ...

Can you pour your own cement driveway?

You can build an attractive concrete driveway yourself, but careful planning and preparation is necessary. Be sure to place all the concrete at...

Last updated Apr 1, 2020

What crafts sell best at flea markets?

10 Crafts That Sell Well at Flea Markets: Bath Bombs. Who doesn't love bath bombs? ... Handmade Earrings. There's just something about handmade...

Last updated Jul 1, 2020

Promotion

Smart doorbells: Alice Beer discusses security risks

SUBSCRIBE Invalid email We use your sign-up to provide content in ways you've consented to and to improve our understanding of you. This may include adverts from us and 3rd parties based on our understanding. You can unsubscribe at any time. More info Ring doorbell cameras are an easy way to monitor your property whether you’re home or not. The smart technology of these video and audio detectors means homeowners can take their own measures to prevent crime - but at what cost? Operating your own home surveillance may be done with good intentions, but it turns out that using them in these three spots could land you in a legal battle that you probably won’t win. Everyone in the UK has a right to a private and family life under Article 8 of the Human Rights Act, 1998. While using a smart doorbell will protect your own privacy, property and belongings, a recent legal battle has proven that it could be at the cost of your neighbours. The scope of smart doorbell technology allows the Ring doorbell to record video and audio footage from five, to 25 feet outward from where it is fixed. Motion detection zones can be un-intrusive to neighbouring properties if set to the right distance, but a careless set-up could leave you in breach of your neighbour's rights. READ MORE: Easy ways to clean stubborn stains from grout without bleach Ring doorbell: Why installing yours in these THREE places could land you a legal battle Using smart doorbells to prevent crime is legal all the time it doesn't intrude on others' privacy From the case Fairhurst v Woodward, Judge Clarke highlighted the importance of proper use of smart doorbells like the Ring doorbell used by the defendant. In order to use your doorbell without risking a breach of your neighbour's privacy, avoid fixing your doorbell in these three positions: So that it looks onto your neighbour's property Too close to the border of your property so that it detects neighbouring audio

What is the best flooring for an outdoor patio?

The Best Outdoor Flooring Options Traditional Wood Decking. We will start with wood because it's probably the #1 option on your mind anyway. ......

Last updated Jan 13, 2020

Does a metal shed need ventilation?

Having good airflow through your metal garden shed will ensure that areas can't get damp. It'll also help to regulate the difference in temperature...

Last updated May 6, 2019

Can I build my own shed?

Yes, with the right plans you can build your dream shed.

Learn More »

Promotion

Where it doesn’t serve to specifically prevent crime

Installing your smart doorbell within a certain range can break data protection laws A recent court case in Oxford found the defendant guilty of breaking GDPR laws using a Ring Doorbell This breaks GDPR as with video footage which can record and store a neighbour's personal conversations. In the case of Fairhurst V Woodward, the ring doorbell was positioned so that it could pick up audio and video activity on the shared and private property of the claimant, Doctor Fairhurst. The issue with this is that the owner of the doorbell has the footage at their disposal to use unlawfully without the knowledge of the neighbour. You are legally bound to comply with data protection law if you are aware of your doorbell posing a threat to a neighbour's privacy on their private property. Ring Doorbells are great for crime prevention on your own property due to their wide scope

Where it isn’t necessary

This point was highlighted by Judge Melissa Clarke in the case of Fairhurst V Woodward where principle two of UK GDPR was considered. Misleading a neighbour to think that your doorbell does not detect activity on their private property breaches the purpose limitation principle of data protection. In this case, Mr Woodwrad lied to Dr Fairuhrst by saying that the device on the shed only captured his own car parking spaces, when in fact it had a wider view of Dr Fairhurst’s parking space. Using your doorbell to prevent crime on your own property is justified by you should always be upfront if you are aware that the scope stretches beyond your own property and onto a neighbouring plot. There is no need to capture personal data for another person in order to prevent crime, only to prevent crime and collect your own personal data.